2011 Holden Cruze vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Holden Cruze. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Holden Cruze would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Cruze (161 HP) has 126 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Holden Cruze | 2012 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Holden | Tata |
| Model | Cruze | Nano |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 35 HP |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4597 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1788 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1477 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2685 mm | 2230 mm |
