2012 Audi RS3 vs. 1978 Mazda 626
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Audi RS3 | 1978 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | RS3 | 626 |
Year Released | 2012 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
Transmission Type | 7-speed automated manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |