2012 Audi TT vs. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (225 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2012 Audi TT. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi TT.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (407 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi TT. (350 Nm). This means 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Audi TT | 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | TT | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2012 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 407 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | 6-speed automated manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4201 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1842 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1359 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2469 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 87 L |