2012 Citroen C-Zero vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Zero is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 860 kg more than 2012 Citroen C-Zero.
Because 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Citroen C-Zero. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Citroen C-Zero | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Citroen | Jeep |
| Model | C-Zero | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Single Speed | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3395 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1475 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
