2012 Holden Epica vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Holden Epica would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (237 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (617 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Holden Epica | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Epica | E |
Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 617 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4805 mm | 4868 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2071 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1465 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2874 mm |