2012 Toyota Sequoia vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Toyota Sequoia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Toyota Sequoia would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 101 kg more than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom.
Because 2012 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Sequoia. (543 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Sequoia.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Toyota Sequoia | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Toyota | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Sequoia | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 381 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 543 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2750 kg | 2649 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 5842 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2029 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1956 mm | 1638 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3099 mm | 3570 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 100 L |
