1949 Riley RM A vs. 2003 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2003 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota RAV4 weights approximately 43 kg more than 1949 Riley RM A.
Because 2003 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Riley RM A | 2003 Toyota RAV4 | |
| Make | Riley | Toyota |
| Model | RM A | RAV4 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1278 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2500 mm |
