1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 203 kg more than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (442 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Cadillac 62. (423 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 2000 GMC Yukon | |
| Make | Cadillac | GMC |
| Model | 62 | Yukon |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5422 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 442 Nm |
| Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2990 mm |
