1951 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 258 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Riley RM A | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | Riley | Nissan |
Model | RM A | Z |
Year Released | 1951 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 327 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1493 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4246 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1315 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2550 mm |