1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1996 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1996 Mercury Villager is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 800 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 1996 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | Austin | Mercury |
| Model | A 40 | Villager |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2860 mm |
