1952 Riley RM A vs. 2001 Toyota Allion
To start off, 2001 Toyota Allion is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Allion is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Allion weights approximately 45 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2001 Toyota Allion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Allion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Toyota Allion has automatic transmission and 1952 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1952 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Toyota Allion will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Riley RM A | 2001 Toyota Allion | |
| Make | Riley | Toyota |
| Model | RM A | Allion |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2720 mm |
