1952 Talbot Baby vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 445 kg more than 2012 Honda CR-Z.
Because 1952 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Talbot Baby | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Talbot | Honda |
| Model | Baby | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 2690 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2436 mm |
