1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk vs. 2010 Volvo S60
To start off, 2010 Volvo S60 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo S60 weights approximately 469 kg more than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 2010 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | 2010 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Studebaker | Volvo |
Model | Sky Hawk | S60 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2779 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1769 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4623 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 67 L |