1963 DKW Munga vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | DKW | Jeep |
| Model | Munga | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 87 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 72 L |
