1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1964 Lotus Elan is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lotus Elan (104 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Cortina | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Cortina | Elan |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 45 L |
