1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Cortina | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 177 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 245 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |