1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 1973 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1973 Triumph Stag is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1973 Triumph Stag. (124 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph Stag. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Triumph Stag weights approximately 5 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph Stag. (192 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph Stag.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Triumph 2000 | 1973 Triumph Stag | |
| Make | Triumph | Triumph |
| Model | 2000 | Stag |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 124 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2550 mm |
