1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 2011 Acura ZDX
To start off, 2011 Acura ZDX is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Acura ZDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Acura ZDX (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Acura ZDX should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Acura ZDX weights approximately 805 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Acura ZDX (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Acura ZDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Triumph 2000 | 2011 Acura ZDX | |
| Make | Triumph | Acura |
| Model | 2000 | ZDX |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4887 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1994 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1595 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2751 mm |
