1963 Triumph 2000 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Corvette
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Corvette (430 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 341 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 291 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Corvette (574 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Corvette will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Triumph 2000 | 2012 Chevrolet Corvette | |
Make | Triumph | Chevrolet |
Model | 2000 | Corvette |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 430 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 574 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1461 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1247 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2685 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 68 L |