1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | ML |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 95 L |