1964 Triumph 2000 vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Polo.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (195 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Triumph 2000 | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Triumph | Volkswagen |
Model | 2000 | Polo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.7 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 19.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 45 L |