1964 Triumph 2000 vs. 2012 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2012 Ford Mondeo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mondeo (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 199 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Mondeo (190 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Triumph 2000 | 2012 Ford Mondeo | |
Make | Triumph | Ford |
Model | 2000 | Mondeo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1369 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 59 L |