1965 Triumph 2000 vs. 2010 Chrysler Town & Country
To start off, 2010 Chrysler Town & Country is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler Town & Country is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler Town & Country (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler Town & Country should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chrysler Town & Country (311 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Chrysler Town & Country will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Triumph 2000 | 2010 Chrysler Town & Country | |
| Make | Triumph | Chrysler |
| Model | 2000 | Town & Country |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 311 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5144 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1953 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3078 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 76 L |
