1966 Abarth OT vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth OT would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Abarth OT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Abarth OT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Abarth OT | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Abarth | Holden |
| Model | OT | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2685 mm |
