1967 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP) has 102 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1107 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Cadillac Eldorado | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Cadillac | MCC |
Model | Eldorado | Smart |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 106 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2082 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 47 L |