1967 Jaguar 240 vs. 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser
To start off, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser (260 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser weights approximately 330 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser (367 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Jaguar 240 | 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | 240 | FJ Cruiser |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 367 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4671 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1811 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 72 L |