1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 310 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1241 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 398 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Cedric | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 544 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 2561 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3700 mm |
