1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2013 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-V is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 505 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-V.
Because 2013 Honda CR-V is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2013 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Honda |
| Model | Silver Shadow | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 2354 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2106 kg | 1601 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1654 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 109 L | 58 L |
