1972 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1965 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. (66 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 217 kg more than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph Spitfire. (94 Nm @ 3760 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Mazda Cosmo | 1965 Triumph Spitfire | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | Cosmo | Spitfire |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1147 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3760 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 942 kg | 725 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2140 mm |
