1972 Triumph 2000 vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ranger weights approximately 202 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Triumph 2000 | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Triumph | Ford |
| Model | 2000 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1447 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3193 mm |
