1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 527 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2011 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
| Model | Bluebird | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 182 HP |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1717 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2858 mm |
