1981 Zastava 102 vs. 2000 ZAZ Slavuta
To start off, 2000 ZAZ Slavuta is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2000 ZAZ Slavuta. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 2000 ZAZ Slavuta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 102 weights approximately 29 kg more than 2000 ZAZ Slavuta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Zastava 102 | 2000 ZAZ Slavuta | |
Make | Zastava | ZAZ |
Model | 102 | Slavuta |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1302 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 774 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2330 mm |