1982 Triumph Acclaim vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Triumph Acclaim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Triumph Acclaim would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1982 Triumph Acclaim. (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1982 Triumph Acclaim.
Because 2011 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Triumph Acclaim, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Triumph Acclaim. (245 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Triumph Acclaim.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Triumph Acclaim | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Triumph | Ford |
Model | Acclaim | F-250 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 3967 mm |