1982 Zastava 102 vs. 2010 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2010 GMC Acadia is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Acadia (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Acadia weights approximately 1372 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Acadia (366 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Zastava 102 | 2010 GMC Acadia | |
| Make | Zastava | GMC |
| Model | 102 | Acadia |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 5098 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1986 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1849 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 3020 mm |
