1984 Lotus Etna vs. 2012 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2012 Toyota Highlander is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Highlander. (280 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Highlander.
Because 2012 Toyota Highlander is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Lotus Etna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Lotus Etna | 2012 Toyota Highlander | |
| Make | Lotus | Toyota |
| Model | Etna | Highlander |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3946 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 331 HP | 280 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4796 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2789 mm |
