1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva. (134 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Captiva.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 2009 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Caterham | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1700 | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2405 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 184 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 65 L |
