1990 BMW 316 vs. 2007 Ford E-250
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 BMW 316 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1990 BMW 316. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1990 BMW 316.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 BMW 316. (141 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 BMW 316. 2007 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 1990 BMW 316 has manual transmission. 1990 BMW 316 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 BMW 316 | 2007 Ford E-250 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 316 | E-250 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |