1998 Rover Mini vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover Mini would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (165 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 687 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (228 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Rover Mini | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Rover | Mazda |
Model | Mini | 3 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 228 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 696 kg | 1383 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2640 mm |