1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1370 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Econoline | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Econoline | 220 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5407 cc | 1776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 474 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2610 mm |
