2000 Seat Arosa vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Seat Ronda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ronda. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 353 kg more than 1982 Seat Ronda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Seat Ronda (122 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 1982 Seat Ronda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Seat Arosa | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Seat | Seat |
Model | Arosa | Ronda |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1359 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 122 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1289 kg | 936 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2460 mm |