2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1982 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 110 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 1982 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lancia Nea | 1982 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Lancia | Mercury |
| Model | Nea | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 4942 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1480 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2650 mm |
