2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1998 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1998 Mazda MPV. (146 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda MPV weights approximately 350 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 1998 Mazda MPV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Mazda MPV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda MPV. (228 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1998 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Nea | MPV |
Year Released | 2001 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 2953 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 228 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1720 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2850 mm |