2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 1960 Skoda Felicia
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Skoda Felicia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Skoda Felicia would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1960 Skoda Felicia. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1960 Skoda Felicia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 455 kg more than 1960 Skoda Felicia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Skoda Felicia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Skoda Felicia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Skoda Felicia. (74 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Skoda Felicia.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 1960 Skoda Felicia | |
| Make | Mazda | Skoda |
| Model | CU-X | Felicia |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1089 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 890 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2400 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 47 L |
