2001 MG ZT vs. 2009 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2009 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG ZT would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saab 05-Sep (256 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2001 MG ZT. (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 2001 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Saab 05-Sep weights approximately 3 kg more than 2001 MG ZT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saab 05-Sep (258 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 MG ZT. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
2001 MG ZT | 2009 Saab 05-Sep | |
Make | MG | Saab |
Model | ZT | 05-Sep |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1578 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1800 mm |