2002 Ford Ka vs. 1996 Holden Statesman

To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden Statesman would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Holden Statesman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Holden Statesman (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Holden Statesman should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Holden Statesman weights approximately 384 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Holden Statesman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Holden Statesman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden Statesman (304 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1996 Holden Statesman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka. 1996 Holden Statesman has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden Statesman will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: