2002 Suzuki F1 vs. 2010 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2010 Renault Scenic is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Scenic (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2010 Renault Scenic.
Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Scenic (191 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2010 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Suzuki F1 | 2010 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Suzuki | Renault |
Model | F1 | Scenic |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1996 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 191 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1215 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |