2003 Westfield XTR 2 vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | 2006 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Westfield | Holden |
| Model | XTR 2 | Epica |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 153 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2700 mm |
