2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2009 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Voyager. (161 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 875 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Voyager (360 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2009 Chrysler Voyager | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Tracker | Voyager |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 360 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 94.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 75 L |