2004 Mazda 3 vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (160 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (203 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 3 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2004 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 102 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 75.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 70.1 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2440 mm |