2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (157 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 140 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (275 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 1996 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Equinox | Grand Voyager |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3425 cc | 3301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 275 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3040 mm |